“I do not agree with a single thing you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

stomring the Bastille, freedom of speech

Storming the Bastille

It’s a phrase widely attributed to Voltaire and often used to characterize the concept of free speech.

It was a freedom not easily won, as the French and American Revolutions showed.

(800 authors, printers and book dealers were incarcerated in the Bastille in Paris when it was stormed in 1789!)

Back then men like John Stuart Mill argued that without this basic freedom there can be no progress in science, law or politics; he believed that free discussion was necessary to prevent the “deep slumber of a decided opinion”. Ideas like this forever changed the face of the western world.

Voltaire, freedom of speech,


Authors and philosophers took huge personal risks to propagate new ideas in the face of an oppressive Church and State authority.

As recent events have showed, those days are not past.

Once it was Christian orthodoxy that made freedom of speech an anathema; the CatholicChurch, we must remember, banned books written by Galileo, Hume, Locke and Voltaire. Jews and unorthodox Christians found sanctuary under Islamic rulers.

Today, ironically, the Church that has reignited the debate about freedom of speech is the fundamental sect of Islam.

Galileo, Inquisition, Freedom of Speech


The right to freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice”.

But in fact freedom of speech is not absolute in any country in the world and is subject to limitation through slander, libel and obscenity laws.

Do you, personally, agree with the right to freedom of expression?

freedom of speech, hate,

photograph: David Shankbone

You do? Would you fight to the death, for example, for Osama bin Laden’s right to call the US the Great Satan?

Would you struggle to have Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ shelved in your local library?

Would you defend the right of the Westboro Baptist Church to preach hate politics?

Article 19 goes on to say that the exercise of FOP rights carries “special duties and responsibilities” and may “therefore be subject to certain restrictions.” So in effect you have the right to free speech except when someone tells you that you haven’t.

osama bin-laden, freedom of speech

osama bin-laden

But when don’t we have that right?

According to the Freedom Forum Organization, society at large recognizes limits on the freedom of speech when it conflicts with other values or rights. Most limitations follow the “offense principle”; for example in the case of pornography, religious belief or hate speech.

So freedom of expression is a complex ideal.

Despite what we like to think, even the West does not have a ‘free press.’  

Julian Assange, freedom of speech

photograph: Elekhh

The media routinely suppresses information or stifles the diversity of voices inherent in true freedom of speech – whisper the name Fox News, for example.

The guiding principle in most western media is: “no money, no voice”.

And as the Julian Assange case shows, freedom of expression is dependent on the notion of national security – but who decides the difference between national security and political self interest?

In effect we tend to believe that freedom of expression is a fact when it is a malleable and ongoing argument, a freedom that is constantly under threat.

The debate about freedom of speech was brought to the fore in Australia recently. We currently have a woman prime minister, Julia Gillard, of whom I am not particularly fond.

alan jones,

Alan Jones.
photograph: Jerry Buckingham

However, she has recently been subject to the most vile abuse, being criticized for her appearance and her dress sense – when are male politicians subject to such scrutiny?

But our political ‘debate’ sank to a new low when a controversial Australian shock jock, Alan Jones, triggered public outrage after saying Julia ‘s father – who passed away unexpectedly last month – “died of shame”.

“To think that he had a daughter who told lies every time she stood for parliament,” he said.

Ms Gillard, who delivered a tearful address to parliament following her beloved father’s death, has refused to take a call from Mr Jones after he offered to apologize.

And last year, our leader of opposition – a certain Mr Tony Abbott – stood on stage attacking her climate change policies in front of crude signs saying “Ditch the Witch” and referred to her as a rival male politician’s “bitch”.

Even sexism is free speech. But as Barack Obama suggested, Ms Gillard chose to refute such abuse with more free speech.

Her 15 minute dressing down became a YouTube sensation. It’s worth listening to some of it.

So where do you stand on free speech? On Thursday I paid tribute to Sherry Jones’ incredibly courageous stand against ignorant fundamentalists who stopped publication of her book ‘The Jewel of Medina’ in the US.

But as you can see here it’s a complex debate and I can assure you, it’s not going away anytime soon.

I’m playing devil’s advocate here; but please comment and tell me what you think.

Anastasia, Colin Falconer


And I’m going to exercise my freedom of expression! I’m letting you know you can now view my European best seller ANASTASIA, right here on the new SLIDESHARE.

About colinfalconer

author of bestselling historical novels like Anastasia, When We Were Gods, Aztec and Harem. My books have been published in the UK, US and ANZ and translated into seventeen languages.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Julia Robb says:

    I’ve found the absolute worst censors in the United States are our fellow Americans, not institutions. People will do anything to silence those with whom they disagree politically or culturally, including ridiculing candidates, marginalizing them, and accusing those on the other side of the political and cultural divide of being evil, destructive, unAmerican, unChristian and, ultimately traitors. Yet, most of these people fail to spend one minute studying issues or listening to the other side. They are voting with their emotions, which they refuse to truly understand. Jung said “The unconscious rules the world.” I agree.

    • I agree, Julia. I found Donald Trump’s reaction to the election results kinda scary. He tweeted: “The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.” and “We should march on Washington and stop this travesty!” Does he mean that if people don’t agree with him, then it’s not democratic? I think this kinda proves your point, yes?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s